In my
initial proposal I was initially inspired by the power materials can hold, and
the consumeristic values associated with art.
I think my
work as deviated slightly, through this exploration and elective input, to be
more influenced by illusion and the power of the object rather than
specifically fashion as stated in my initial proposal. My work has developed to
consider audience engagement and put the viewer’s reaction at the forefront.
The purpose of creating a powerful object was so the viewer could feel an
engrossment with it, a desire to look, to own.
My original
idea was to create a shop window display featuring non wearable garments,
however during my experimental stages I deviated away from the garment side and
realized I was more influenced by the materials rather than the form of a
garment. In the end I have produced a similar display- influenced by consumer
values and advertising. In the end I really simplified my content with
influence from the avant-garde mini course. This power that the objects hold due to their aesthetic appeal, works on the viewers human desire to gaze and be captivated by the object. The object has power over the viewer. I wanted to show the juxtaposition between
the raw materials and the influence of commodity and desire to produce an extra
ordinary object from something mundane.
Though the
content has changed, the context and themes of my work have remained. I have
explored power and value associated with the object, its effect on society and
the viewer as a consumer.
Overall I think
studio 2a has definitely allowed me to explore and investigate concepts of
interest, and electives such as the there-ness elective have sparked new ideas
which have gone on to shape my studio work. I feel as though studio 2A has allowed me to understand art as a concept, my own practise, and established a signature style.
No comments:
Post a Comment